Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Why Rockets for Space Travel?

In 1967 on April 20, on Hitler's Birthday like he had been foretold, I discovered in Canada  the technology of the Flying Saucer: Gravity Control.
After I got the Patents I offered it to Nasa and suggested to apply it to the Shuttles.
A copy of the Patent was sent to the John Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio.
The Propulsion Engineers there were aghast.
Who would need them if a Shuttle did not need rockets anymore but would come off the ground like an airplane and fly with a constant acceleration force of ONE G per second to the ISS in one hour, the Moon in a couple of hours and to Mars within one day?   (braking half-way with the same force).
The inherent forcefield of the system would protect Shuttle and Crew from collisions with Space Debris and Radiation.
The letter that I got said: "Not interested, thank you for the copy of your Patent!"
The Hudson Institute told my US Patent Lawyer, Mr. Farkas,  that they had evaluated the possibility of the invention at $600 Billion, if the USA would have it before Russia.  Mr. Farkas predicted the Nobel Prize for me.
After the Space Disasters they decided to experiment with it, did not contact me for advice like I had urged, got the setting of an E-Bomb instead of the one for Gravity Control and Propulsion and caused another disaster: The Big Black-out of 2003. Yes, they blamed a poor, innocent tree for it all.
The American Public lapped it up , Nasa would not lie!
I did not describe in my Patent how the Saucer "taps" energy out of the aether but Nasa would have had the use of it too.
Read up at my patent by typing:>  www.rexresearch.com/hiddink/hiddink.htm < and wonder why Nasa will now be delegated to the last position in Space Travel.
Who should have  it now?  Russia ,India or China?
Mr. Borden is not interested in it either. The One Billion Dollar Heavy Lifter is his baby.